SCORPIONVERDEAll-Season tyre reviews

We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.

To the shop categories: 4x4 tyres

SCORPIONVERDEAll-Season tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow

Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 25 test results
Ø 4,822,542 km driven

Score

Buy and information SCORPIONVERDEAll-Season

12.08.2015 from	Note 4.38
(1,500 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions N/A
Grip in wet conditions N/A
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear N/A
Fuel consumption N/A

Tyre size and vehicle make
215 / 65 R16
NISSAN XTrail
Result: Would you buy again? Possibly
Comment:
High-pitsched noise at speed is a problem

20.06.2015 from Rogers-Lewis	Note 4.44
(9,500 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions N/A
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption

Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 60 R16
KIA Sportage
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Not tested in winter conditions yet. Reports received re good winter tyres is reason purchased.

25.05.2015 from Paul	Note 4.68
(7,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption

Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 65 R17 R
LAND ROVER FREELANDER
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely
Comment:
Great in wet and snow and very low road noise

01.03.2015 from	Note 4.4
(5,000 km driven)

Grip in dry conditions
Braking in dry conditions
Grip in wet conditions
Braking in wet conditions
Grip in snow
Driving comfort
Internal noise level
Tyre wear
Fuel consumption

Tyre size and vehicle make
235 / 60 R18 V
VOLVO XC60
Result: Would you buy again? Definitely

‹

›